The Bush and Kerry Run for President essays

The Bush and Kerry Run for President essays Since the beginning of the presidential campaigns the two candidates knew very well how important the Hispanic vote was going to be on the Election Day. That's why both parties have used every possible resource to win the Hispanic vote. Latinos, the biggest minority group, have to take the responsibility of voting for the candidate who they feel has the best plan for the Hispanic community. The best way for the Hispanic people to choose the right candidate is by educating themselves on the policies of both parties. For example, one issue that concerns Hispanics is the unemployment situation. During the four years of Bush's term, 385,000 Hispanics have lost their jobs, and unemployment has increased 39 percent (John Kerry Asks Hispanics for Their Support 1). The deficit of the country is at its highest with $445 billion. Bush's plan is to cut expenses by eliminating 65 domestic programs that would help people with alcoholic problems and give secondary school counseling (Gonzales 4). On the other hand, John Kerry wants to create more jobs containing higher pay. Kerry says that Hispanics represent 18.9% of those workers that would be affected by increasing the minimum wage to $7 an hour by 2007 (John Kerry Asks Hispanics for Their Support 2). Kerry says he would cut the deficit in half within his first term. He wants to change many of the tax cuts made by Bush, but will keep the ones that benefit the middle class the most (Gonzales 4). According to the article "John Kerry Asks Hispanics for Their Support," Health care is another important issue that concerns the Hispanic community. 12.8 million Hispanics were without health insurance at some point last year (2). Bush has created a program that expanded Medicare. This law helps the elderly people tremendously by providing more prescription drug coverage. However, Bush's plan hasn't benefited those who don't have insurance. Latinos are 33 percent of these people. Bush prop...

The President Makes Grammatical Errors Too! Tenet vs. Tenant and Obamas Tucson Speech

The President Makes Grammatical Errors Too! Tenet vs. Tenant and Obamas Tucson Speech I got an email from my friend Seth Nowak on January 13, 2011 reporting, â€Å"Obama said ‘tenent’ in his speech last night.   One term president.† The speech to which Seth was referring is the moving, poignant speech Obama delivered following the shooting rampage in Tucson.   Obviously Seth was joking to me, The Essay Expert, that a small error like mixing up â€Å"tenet† with â€Å"tenant† would affect (not effect) Obama’s approval rating. Just a few days before, I had corrected Seth when he said â€Å"tenent† (or â€Å"tenant† he was speaking not writing, so I can’t be sure) when he meant â€Å"tenet.†Ã‚   Thus he could not help but notice Obama’s slip of tongue. To clarify, â€Å"tenet† means â€Å"any opinion, principle, doctrine, dogma, etc., esp. one held as true by members of a profession, group, or movement.† A tenant, on the other hand, is a person, a group of persons, or an entity occupying a space, usually a rental space (my definition). â€Å"Tenent† is not a word in modern English, though in the interests of full disclosure, it is listed on dictionary.com as â€Å"Obs.† (Obsolete).   It does not appear anywhere in the dictionary on my shelf, Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (copyright 1987, the year I headed to college – and if that’s not obsolete, I don’t know what is). Obama’s spoken sentence was as follows: â€Å"They were fulfilling a central tenant[sic] of the democracy envisioned by our founders.† The transcriber was kind to our President.   The text â€Å"tenant[sic]† does not appear in the transcription; instead, the official version in The New York Times reads, â€Å"They were fulfilling a central tenet.† The day before Obama’s speech, I had put â€Å"tenant/tenet† on my list of Top 10 Grammatical Errors of 2011 (scheduled for publication in December 2011).   Why?   Because inside of one week in January, not including Obama’s speech, I heard â€Å"tenant† used incorrectly twice: once by Seth as reported above, and once in a draft of a law school application essay.   I won’t quote that essay here for reasons of confidentiality, but here’s an example of a sentence in a draft law school application essay I received a year ago: â€Å"The general tenants of my thesis was that developing a national childcare system would contribute to the economy and better the lives of all Canadians.† This sentence has two problems:   First, she meant â€Å"tenet†; and second, even if â€Å"tenants† were correct, the verb â€Å"was† is singular whereas â€Å"tenants† is plural.   This client was not accepted into any Canadian law schools, despite the fact that her errors were corrected.   She did get accepted in England. The moral of the story:   If you want to get into law school, or be elected for a second term, get straight about the difference between â€Å"tenet† and â€Å"tenant.†Ã‚   I understand that â€Å"n† sound just wants to come out somehow, but try to keep it in check. So what do you think?   One term or two?   Perhaps that’s really the important question here.